by Alphonse Ponzillo on Tuesday, November 8, 2011 at 10:46am
     The money hoarding principle or policy has escalated in proportion to its progressional time span to route spending (dollars) from the dollar stores to the capitalist financial accounts for distribution of financial aid to promote ' enterprise ' growth from a 2.? % profit increase to attain an infinite money growth . The investment in 'prosperity growth' that has been invested in 'enterprise', is reported to have been frivorosly and purposely awarded to many 'enterprise networks'
that are not self-sustaining and that have verbally announced they have no ability to attain profitable goals. A search is on to captivate an alternative to secure money growth with financial reductions on mortgages to encourage  purchasing, education programs, and their medical reduction on civilian hospital policies toeliminate medical procedures for an increase cost in medical care. There are many obstacles confronting our civilian societies for a goal to capture an increase in capital growth and our civil needs are in jeopardy. The escalations in pricing of  food, gas, medical cost, education, and many additional increases do rupture the financial dependency on all members of a civilian society. National leaders and representatives responsible for this dilemma are immune to the loss values of lifes' needs and are not economically or emotionally effected with their health benefits, medical benefits, education benefits, vacation benefits and benefits we may not be aware. These benefits awarded to national leaders and their representatives are paid with our tax dollars.
     The above paragraph is an introduction to an explanation of present occurrences of the financial jeopardy purposely introduced to civilian societies by federal national heads of state of western dominance to accelerate economic control for the loss of civil welfare and social necessities for the purpose of a capitalist growth adventure. It is necessary for civilian societies to know and recognize how and why the defense of government rule has a militant government ideology and performance for their goals to promote and discipline topics of national and international concern for their victory to maintain segregation and confusion of all civilian societies for their purpose to dominate all 'money' and all 'money consumption' for their own purpose. The barbaric attacks by America and western nations on Arab nations and other eastern nations are to take their 'money consumption' so eastern nations do not have industry or business. Sovereignty to protect their money loss is gone. The development of all nations will be honored with American and western control. All needs for development are for their money benefit and their capitol growth.
    The present federal elections in western societies will associate the same policy programs to insure guidance in present developments are not distorted. The secretaries and other federal officials will process policies with their minds imbedded and indoctrinated to produce a form of thought to satisfy their desired result. We, the civilian society, must investigate the process used to produce their desired result and how their desired result reflects our civilian loss. If there is a gain to reduce the civilian loss it should not be considered an asset or a benefit. The economic strife compelling our civilian society to motivate in reverse caused by a life standard increases with no wage increases to offset cost is bankruptcy. This mode of life style and life value will deteriorate by an compromising vote by government to continue the money growth program with continued economic jeopardy the government will impose on the civilian society. There will never be a loss,of earned money or money compensation paid, to the federal authorities.
     The current enforced military blockades on land and sea have been instigated by the American government to prevent economic growth of all nations not complying to American policy. The Cuban Blockade is entering its fifty year embargo. The policies of this embargo were worded to penalize nations issuing trade provisions with Cuba or penalize nations of trade ships entering Cuba. Land blockades are performing the same purpose for the same result, eliminating the doctrine and policy subversive to American goals. The 'Cuban Missile Crisis' in 1962 was imposed by Russia when American Military invaded Cuba and failed. The Russian government intended to enforce Cuba's sovereignty when America insisted to re-establish its' government on Cuban soil and failed. A more provocative stimulus is initiated on eastern and Arab nations that want their sovereignty...war. President Kennedy started the Cuban Blockade, President Clinton expanded the trade embargo on the Cuban Blockade and President Obama again extended the Cuban Blockade through Sept. 14, 2012.
     Do not believe Barack Obama or Mitt Romney will indorse an economic difference to terminate a state of war to a state of compromise. These three men, Mitt Romney, Barack Obama and William ( Bill) Clinton will endorse war to promote the economic greed for growth with war and subversion, loss of life and the elimination of men and societies of nations that desire a government with their belief of their doctrine and their policy. President Woodrow Wilson sought to encourage nations to adopt a peace policy to eliminate war and devised 'The League of Nations' which faltered. President Franklin Roosevelt did not want war but did not halt our country's militant engagements to incite Japan and Germany to be induced into military conflict with the United States. It was our C.I.A., then at an elementary grade, performing militant nefarious activity assumed a command of covert activity that destabilized communication and security of the Axis powers. The system of government the Axis powers represented for their one world government is now in the system of one world government for the Allied powers, the United States, England, France, Italy, Germany and nations that alien themselves with Allied doctrine and policy. Nefarious and covert C.I.A. activity was suspended by President Kennedy and reinstated by President Lyndon Johnson to emphasize use of a militant covert strategy to subject its authority to isolate and eliminate undesirable persons and societies from existing. It is  correct to assume this militant covert strategy developed into an extremely expansive and extremely covert manipulation of strategic domination to execute, actually kill, non-militant persons and non-militant societies with immunity and impunity to obtain satisfaction for the stabilization necessary to achieve desired results. Is this continuation of war programs mastered and designed by American government and enforced by American military to kill for their economic posterity to continue? Is this capital growth policy to be welcomed to impose capital growth for an individual capital gain that will inflict a gross economic barrier and inflict a gross social and civil strife to expand our present 'rich to poor' policy to a depth of 'richest and poorest'. Present broadcasters and editorialist have concentrated their topics on government imposed ideology to indoctrinate their 'need' for civil support. The government also imposes the same communication strategy to gain civil support for political goals that accompany their desired result. Presently our news media has centered its news communication on two presidential candidates Mr. Cain and Mr. Romney. The G.O.P. strategy is to isolate their favored nominees Mr. Romney, a war provider, and Mr. Cain , a war provider, from their unfavored nominee, Mr. Paul, a non war provider. Mr. Paul's topic ' Offer Friendship to Iran ' was stated on Fox news. The war trend of the G.O.P. is enforcing their goal to inflict jeopardy on their undesired nations for their money gain and insure undesired nations are not able to establish their sovereignty.
       Should we, American senior citizens, vote to elect a president of our choice that could encumber the civil and social needs our children, our grand children and our youths  for their desired growth in their lifes' values? Will we insist on war to satisfy need?