‎~International Democracy- A Civil And Social Plebeian And Proletariat Failure~
Labor is not a necessity for livable needs in the United States of America. Labor is the necessary need to develop, produce and transport materials. "Increased Labor", "Increased Employment" is necessary for the expansions of the developments, the expansions of productions and the increased transportations of materials. "Labor" is the "Proletariat". Labor is the responsibility of the Proletariat. "Increased Labor", represents increased profit and increased growth for the "Money Masters" from all the efforts of the Laborer, the Proletariat. "Increased Labor" does not need to induce an "Increase Employment" factor. Multitude laborious tasks are the responsibility of one Proletariat. The 'cost' of Increased Employment is redeemed by the Money Masters with the increased purchases of the Proletariat. The allotted wage or salary increases to the Increased Employment Factors are also redeemed through increased purchases to the Money Masters. And what is the economic reimbursement to the Proletariat?? NONE??!! The accumulation of all attributes of wealth the Proletariat labors to provide from the efforts of their labors are a donation to the Money Masters. There is no money exchange or economic relief to lessen the economic burden and strife on the Proletariat. The economic burden and strife of the Proletariats' economic societies levels are layered and factored to diminish the economic burden and strife from those of a more elite earning capacity to those of a less earning capacity. This segregated and isolated economic barrier is purposely instilled and factored to escalate the burden and strife of the least economic wage level. Why?? The purpose is the isolation of each economic level to discard the concerns of economic fault in each economic society layer. The ignorance that subdues this economic conception favors the progression of the wealth and permanent occupancy of the elite dominant Money Masters. The livable needs of each economic wage level do not have the equal magnitude of burden and strife.
In 2010 the United States of America instituted their political and economic "Solidarity "campaign to eliminate civil and social taxed austerity programs from their federal budget (from their civilian societies). Their "Solidarity" campaign was instigated and
admitted in the European Union if the year 2011. The episodes of chaos, riots and rebellions were the responsibility of the omission of the austerity policies provided with government funding. The governments tax reimbursement from the omission its austerity policies provided funding for economic growth. The profits from this political and economical overture were thrust into the financing of business growth funds. The increase in profits were reinvested in other growth funds to expand funding for the growth of various businesses and industries. The Increased Labor, the Proletariat, was necessary for all increased production. The increased dollars spent are spent on the increased production of products owned by the Money Masters. The Laborers, the Proletariats, do not receive an equal economic reimbursement for their toil, for their forged and forced patronage to a labor domain designed to capture their earnings. The Proletariats are forced into a credit and loan living necessities which high interest rates are incorporated for economical growth benefits. The Proletariat has again receives no economic benefits. The Proletariat has again experienced an omission of an economic austerity policy that was ignored by the Money Masters.
Can the " Money Masters "classification for their endeavorment of money control with disregard to the contribution of human labor be considered an traitorous or embezzlement on the American Civilian Society or International Civilian Societies by their "Respected Governments"?? Is there a violation of Human Rights in the confiscation of wages for capital gains that increases the economic burden and strife on the American governments unrepresented concerns and the American governments misrepresented concerns of the American civilian society?? Is there a violation of Human Rights in the confiscation of wages for capital gains that increases the economic burden and strife on the American governments unrepresented concerns and the American governments misrepresented concerns of the American civil